Bug#681419: Alternative main->non-free dependencies text
On 06/29/2013 11:43, Andreas Barth wrote:
> However, for recommends there might be cases where this is not
> possible (because there are only non-main-packages), and this case is
> not considered RC right now. This is the more interessting point for
> me.
A package in main recommending a package in non-main (with no
alternative in main) is already a policy violation. It's covered in the
same sentence as depending on a non-main package (2.2.1).
What do you want to be changed here?
Ansgar
Reply to: