[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

SI units (was Re: failure to communicate)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 04/04/13 22:43, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting ian_bruce@fastmail.net (ian_bruce@fastmail.net):
>
>> If Debian bug report #684128 proves anything, it is that you will never
>> convince anyone with technical argument, facts advanced in support of
>
>
> I perfectly understand you can be frustrated but, honestly, as of now,
> we're focused on the wheezy release, again. Fixing debootstrap has
> much more importance than Giga/Gibibytes. Once wheezy is released, I
> see no reason for your proposed patch to be "rejected".

Sadly, it appears that failure to communicate was from both sides

Ian was told several times that changes may not be accepted for wheezy

However, that communication was overshadowed by several comments
suggesting nobody cares about the issue at all, rather than comments
like that above explaining the relative importance of fixing other issues.

This issue of units comes up again and again, there is a huge thread on
debian-devel in 2007[1] - that hardly seems like something that nobody
cares about.

So while it may not make it into wheezy (I won't give my own opinion on
this one, it is for the release team to decide), I don't think the
reporter of this bug should be deterred by comments about it being a
trivial wishlist or nonsense item.

It may actually be useful for the technical committee to review what is
on the wiki and make some general statement about Debian's position (if
they haven't done so in the past), and that can guide the way similar
bugs are classified for jessie and beyond.

1. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/06/thrd2.html#00700

2. http://wiki.debian.org/ConsistentUnitPrefixes


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=L0ZB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: