Bug#700759: Shared library policy on private libs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 2/22/2013 1:48 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> No. Both situations are buggy and neither of them is acceptable in
> testing.
>
> [There are situations where we do knowingly introduce
> uninstallability to testing, but those are always short term and to
> "unblock" a greater problem such as a large transition. We'd rather
> never have to do so and it certainly shouldn't be expected to be a
> standard part of the transition for a particular package.]
So that leaves us with ntfs-3g needs to comply with 8.1 and place the
libs in a lib-SONAME package, or is just removing the -dev package
enough to qualify for the section 8 exemption?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRJ4RZAAoJEJrBOlT6nu75eA0H/3yOrdsD3TrbFLvWjmFzmheY
9v11vUTuDcffXcM4HXnf5FnZvU4lGrkxwoR8KIRVvLFrmn62vk+SWt6k6bL0l04P
p0g/Gbue1iDOpfVNomMeS6d936EjqQC241o8oyykXPwphAqRtOH6CHlt9TwkTnJL
2q9Zi7qut8r7XAQNGvKT/N5mI9r5OVwmqysy1LhKC2US+YsNekrzPqniGsvXoGyf
BholCkQFh8LqcE8qZG7hMnmr/PLLV/9USLi8KZhLAmfBl6cHampNQPG6UnXTiqmY
KAf6xM7Qy1mdlBsf4XbGNZx5YpwNjlEyOUheaOTt+eFtGLVregevXfuakqzErf8=
=pUAp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: