[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#698556: Processed: Please override isdnutils maintainer's decision to not fix the broken isdnutils package in wheezy



Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> writes:

> On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Andreas Barth wrote:
>> 4. While I see reasons to consider the udev solution nicer if it
>> would be available, I fail to see a reason why it would be better to
>> have users creating their own startup scripts then to include
>> sensible defaults in ours.
>
> What is the reason for not including these scripts in the package by
> default and removing them/disabling them when the necessary udev
> improvements have been made?

I would like an answer to this, too.

The "right answer" long term is clearly for the kernel/udev to create
the right devices, but until that time comes it seems obvious to me that
the isdnutils maintainer scripts should do what is needed.

Bdale

Attachment: pgp3J7aw6YmhJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: