Bug#699808: tech-ctte: syslinux vs the wheezy release
- To: 699808@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.net, debian-release@lists.debian.org, debian-boot@lists.debian.org, 699742@bugs.debian.org, Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org>
- Subject: Bug#699808: tech-ctte: syslinux vs the wheezy release
- From: Don Armstrong <don@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 15:55:09 -0800
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20130205235509.GM6814@rzlab.ucr.edu>
- Mail-followup-to: 699808@bugs.debian.org, daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.net, debian-release@lists.debian.org, debian-boot@lists.debian.org, 699742@bugs.debian.org, Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org>
- Reply-to: Don Armstrong <don@debian.org>, 699808@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20130205233135.GA24016@mraw.org>
- References: <[🔎] 20130205124822.GA25666@radis.cristau.org> <[🔎] 51110599.1070006@progress-technologies.net> <[🔎] 20130205233135.GA24016@mraw.org>
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.net> (05/02/2013):
> > or:
> >
> > * apply the following tested and working patch from #699742 in
> > debian-installer, […]
>
> Except that this “tested and working patch” doesn't fix anything. Same
> issue, as seen by Michael and myself.
Is it the intention of the Release Managers not to accept a newer
version of syslinux into wheezy? [That is, if the CTTE were to decide
to require some "fix" to d-i, we'd also have to override the RMs?]
Don Armstrong
--
I now know how retro SCOs OSes are. Riotous, riotous stuff. How they
had the ya-yas to declare Linux an infant OS in need of their IP is
beyond me. Upcoming features? PAM. files larger than 2 gigs. NFS over
TCP. The 80's called, they want their features back.
-- Compactable Dave http://www3.sympatico.ca/dcarpeneto/sco.html
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Reply to: