Russ Allbery wrote: > Actually, it could ship in the regular shared library path. It would just > change its SONAME a lot, which would be fine, since no other applications > would link against it and therefore no one would really care. And indeed > it would probably have to be in the public search path because libcups > itself would doubtless need to depend on it. Would setting DT_RUNPATH on libcups work to avoid that?