Re: Bug#573745: Initial draft of resolution of the Python Maintainer question
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Just a comment on the above 3 options. Considering the fact that
> this conflict has been very long running now, I think it is
> important to be clear on how the tech-ctte has assembled the set of
> possible team options. I presume the above options descend directly
> from the discussions I've solicited on the -python list.
That's correct.
> If that is the case, I suggest to briefly mention that the options
> have been formed discussing "with all relevant and interested
> parties, on the -python list" or something similar. A relevant
> reference would be:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2012/04/threads.html#00008
I don't have a problem with that, except that I think that shouldn't
be in the resolution itself. [Though perhaps an additional sentence in
the opening explanatory paragraph would be enough to document that?]
Don Armstrong
--
They say when you embark on a journey
of revenge
dig two graves.
They underestimate me.
-- a softer world #560
http://www.asofterworld.com/index.php?id=560
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Reply to: