Bug#688772: gnome Depends network-manager-gnome

[Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

Andreas Barth writes ("Re: Bug#688772: gnome Depends network-manager-gnome"):
> However, I'm not sure if 6. is too detailed, or should just be written
> as 
>     a. Any way which increases the likelihood of network-manager
>        being installed (this includes also messages, user-face
>        warnings etc)

6 was a list of the further ways I thought of to subvert the
decision.  I do have the catch-all as well, so I think my list is
broader.  I do think it's necessary to preempt sabotage of non-nm
gnome systems.

> Also the first sentence of 9. might need to be dropped. Perhaps adding
> something like "using words like 'crusade' together with implementing
> a tech ctte decision is inappropriate" might be better?

TBH I think it unlikely that enough of our colleagues will agree to
even 9.  And it may be unnecessary, given the rest.  I think 8 is
necessary.

I don't think mentioning the rude language in the TC resolution is
really appropriate.

Ian.