Bug#682010: Call for votes on CELT in Mumble
On Friday, August 24, 2012 12:16:01, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Chris Knadle writes ("Bug#682010: Call for votes on CELT in Mumble"):
> > On Friday, August 24, 2012 11:03:31, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > […]
> >
> > > 14. Consequently, the mumble source package should be configured to
> > >
> > > use an embedded copy of celt 0.7.1. (If necessary the embedded
> > > copy of celt in the source package should be updated to the
> > > actual 0.7.1.)
> >
> > We figured out a month ago that Celt 0.7.1 in the Debian system library
> > and the version in the upstream Mumble source for embedding are the
> > same. [1]
>
> > I'll copy it again here for convenience:
>
> Right.
>
> > $ diff -r -u celt-0.7.1/libcelt mumble/celt-0.7.0-src/libcelt
> > Only in celt-0.7.1/libcelt: Makefile.in
> >
> > [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2012/07/msg00333.html
>
> But you might want to rename it. I don't think we (the TC) need to
> have an opinion about that. I don't want to tie the mumble
> maintainers' hands on these kinds of details.
It would be nice to do eventually; i.e. renaming celt-0.7.0 to celt-0.7.1 to
make it clear what version Mumble actually had in it. There are several of
these little things I'd like to send upstream patches or Git pull requests
for, but I don't think it's necessary to deal with it now.
Likewise I found that the mumble upstream source currently builds in Opus
version 0.9.8, but the library comes out named as "libopus.so.0.0.0" which
again is non-intuitive as to what version it actually is. This doesn't really
matter for the version in Debian because it will use Debian's libopus0 library
instead (which contains Opus version 0.9.14, which I found to be compatible).
> But if you would be happier I can withdraw the version above and ask
> for a vote on a text without the parenthetical comment.
I thank you for the offer, but I don't think that's necessary. Fine as-is.
-- Chris
--
Chris Knadle
Chris.Knadle@coredump.us
Reply to: