Re: Bug#682010: [mumble] Communication failures due to CELT codec library removal
On Monday, July 23, 2012 13:26:57, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2012, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > On Monday, July 23, 2012 10:34:28, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Of these 2. would seem to be the best option.
> > I agree.
> I believe in order to actually evaluate any of these solutions,
> someone is going to have to prepare binaries, and do an table showing
> the tested (not theoretical) compatibility of with multiple different
> clients (and servers?) to their solution's server and client.
> I propose that whoever wants to see a particular solution actually sit
> down and do the work for their particular solution, with sources,
> binaries, interdiffs, and compatibility table conveniently available in
> some public location.
That sounds reasonable. I might need occasional advice but otherwise I think
I can handle this.