Re: Bug#682010: [mumble] Communication failures due to CELT codec library removal
On Friday, July 20, 2012 19:24:17, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jul 2012, Ron wrote:
> > One very last thing then, before I hopefully stop bothering you for
> > a while (:
> > > ** Use speex instead
> > >
> > > + Clients cannot currently report speex version during codec
> > > selection process
> > I don't understand where that issue came from?
> > Speex has been API and bitstream compatible since, like 2006, or maybe
> > before.
> > Maybe I totally misunderstand what that's saying, but anything relying on
> > a "speex version" is almost surely Doing It Wrong.
> Chris asked for this to be added IIRC; I believe that this should
> really be "currently report speex support" rather than "speex
Yes I think the above wording is better. I was reading code where several
versions of CELT are reported and versions compared -- and since there isn't
any code for reporting speex availability, I made an assumption as to how that
would theoretically be handled.
> Don Armstrong
> 1: Hopefully I'll be corrected if I'm wrong; it's likely that I
> introduced the incorrect wording too.
With a list of complications this long, something will end up being worded