Re: TC-initiated GRs, redux
Russ Allbery writes ("Re: TC-initiated GRs, redux"):
> Ian Jackson <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > informal-propose allow private discussion (const. change)
> I'm fine with this, although I'm mildly in favor of counterproductive
> instead of infeasible or unconstructive now that we've had some more
> discussion. I think the more general discussion of whether we need to say
> something stronger would be fine to have during the discussion period of
> the GR (and since I'm sure there will be comments there, I don't want to
> spend too much time "pre-discussing" it).
I've changed it in my draft to "infeasible or counterproductive".