Re: Bug#614907: nodejs/node command conflict: reasons to include the command in each package
Ian Jackson wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder writes ("Bug#614907: nodejs/node command conflict: reasons to include the command in each package"):
>> There is a transition plan and patch for the (ham radio) node in
>> #614907. Nobody has been able to demonstate any appreciable problems
>> with renaming it. Indeed, noone has demonstrated any likely reason
>> for its "node" command to be run directly.
> The fact that the ham radio people have made a transition plan must
> not be allowed to become a weapon in the hands of the other
I made that plan and am neither a ham radio person nor a Node.js
person. Make of that what you will.