Re: Bug#636783: proposed constitution fix for super-majority within the tech ctte
* Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) [120319 05:10]:
> Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:
> > Andreas Barth writes:
>
> >> As I got no further comments from other people of the tech ctte, this
> >> can only mean that everyone agrees with this version, or is not
> >> interessted.
>
> > I think the version I quote (as amended) is the best.
>
> I agree with that proposal and think it would be a worthwhile amendment.
> I'd be happy to see someone drive this forward.
>
> Andreas, did you want us to vote on whether to bring this forward as a GR,
> or was this bug more in the way of a medium for discussion?
I'd like to vote on it, because I think it's better for the GR if the
tech ctte decided to see these changes implemented.
> I would be happy to go forward with the GR to fix the supermajority rule
> by itself, since I think it's uncontroversial and could be easily passed.
Good. In that case I think we should just call for votes, and vote it,
and do the other topics in different GRs?
Andi
Reply to: