Bug#636783: proposed constitution fix for super-majority within the tech ctte

[Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>]

* Peter Palfrader (weasel@debian.org) [110814 22:11]:
> Hey,
> 
> On Sat, 06 Aug 2011, Anthony Towns wrote:
> 
> > -         2. An option A defeats the default option D by a majority ratio
> > -            N, if V(A,D) is strictly greater than N * V(D,A).
> > -         3. If a supermajority of S:1 is required for A, its majority
> > -            ratio is S; otherwise, its majority ratio is 1.
> > +         2. An option A defeats the default option D provided that:
> > +              (a) V(A,D) is strictly greater than V(D,A); and
> > +              (b) if a supermajority of N:1 is required, then V(A,D)
> > +                  is greater than or equal to N * V(D/A).
>                                                      ^^^^^^
> ITYM V(D,A), i.e. a comma seperates the two parameters of V.

As I got no further comments from other people of the tech ctte, this
can only mean that everyone agrees with this version, or is not
interessted.

So, unless someone proposes another option, I intend to call for
votes in a week so that I know better which of the two options it is.


Andi