Bug#636783: proposed constitution fix for super-majority within the tech ctte
* Peter Palfrader (firstname.lastname@example.org) [110814 22:11]:
> On Sat, 06 Aug 2011, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > - 2. An option A defeats the default option D by a majority ratio
> > - N, if V(A,D) is strictly greater than N * V(D,A).
> > - 3. If a supermajority of S:1 is required for A, its majority
> > - ratio is S; otherwise, its majority ratio is 1.
> > + 2. An option A defeats the default option D provided that:
> > + (a) V(A,D) is strictly greater than V(D,A); and
> > + (b) if a supermajority of N:1 is required, then V(A,D)
> > + is greater than or equal to N * V(D/A).
> ITYM V(D,A), i.e. a comma seperates the two parameters of V.
As I got no further comments from other people of the tech ctte, this
can only mean that everyone agrees with this version, or is not
So, unless someone proposes another option, I intend to call for
votes in a week so that I know better which of the two options it is.