Re: Bug#587886: future of maintaining of the bootloader LILO
* Ian Jackson (ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk) [101130 19:31]:
> Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: Bug#587886: future of maintaining of the bootloader LILO"):
> > I'd like to point out that neither of your votes are signed.
>
> This is true. But there is no requirement for TC members' votes to be
> signed. If there were any doubt about whether my vote was a forgery I
> would get out my key and sign it, but I don't have a suitable TCB to
> hand right now.
I agree that signing votes isn't required for the tech ctte.
Andi
Reply to: