Bug#587886: future of maintaining of the bootloader LILO
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Is there any objection to starting the voting process on this issue
> with the options presented in
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587886#55 ?
> [for reference:
> A. lilo should be removed. In the meantime, William is to be sole
> maintainer of lilo. His promised request to the ftp team to
> remove lilo should be honoured, after which the ftp masters should
> not permit Matt and/or Joachim to reupload a new lilo package.
> B. lilo should be retained in unstable. Matt and Joachim are to be
> joint maintainers of lilo.
1: Whose brain seized up at SQ.
My spelling ability, or rather the lack thereof, is one of the wonders
of the modern world.