[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#587886: future of maintaining of the bootloader LILO

On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Is there any objection to starting the voting process on this issue
> with the options presented in
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587886#55 ?
> [for reference:
>  A. lilo should be removed.  In the meantime, William is to be sole
>     maintainer of lilo.  His promised request to the ftp team to
>     remove lilo should be honoured, after which the ftp masters should
>     not permit Matt and/or Joachim to reupload a new lilo package.
>  B. lilo should be retained in unstable.  Matt and Joachim are to be
>     joint maintainers of lilo.  

I vote

Status Quo

Don Armstrong[1]
1: Whose brain seized up at SQ.
My spelling ability, or rather the lack thereof, is one of the wonders
of the modern world.

http://www.donarmstrong.com              http://rzlab.ucr.edu

Reply to: