[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#562945: fails to install

Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:
> I wrote:
>> Steve Langasek writes ("Re: Bug#562945: Bug#582755: Bug#562945: fails to install"):

>>> In summary, my proposal would be to:

>>>  - decline to override the runit-run maintainer, whose use of debconf is
>>>    discouraged but /not/ forbidden by Policy
>>>  - advise the Policy maintainers to proceed with the existing proposed
>>>    language regarding high-priority prompts
>>>  - refer the question of overall releasability of runit-run to the Release
>>>    Team

>> I agree.  I see that in #224509 Russ writes that the new wording has
>> been merged for the next release.

> Just for the avoidance of doubt, we need to say clearly that we agree
> with the submitters of #562945 and #574223 that the current behaviour of
> runinit is a bug.  So the bug should remain open and be reassigned to
> runinit.

> We are not ruling on whether the bug is release criticial, and that
> question is part of what the Release Team will have to decide.

Yup, I agree.

Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

Reply to: