On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:38:11 -0700, Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote: > Personally, I don't think runit-run's behavior here is what's intended to be > allowed under Policy. I agree. The current behavior in the case where the question is answered "yes" seems completely inadequate, and the mere presence of the question strikes me as an acknowledgement of that fact by the maintainer! > In summary, my proposal would be to: > > - decline to override the runit-run maintainer, whose use of debconf is > discouraged but /not/ forbidden by Policy > - advise the Policy maintainers to proceed with the existing proposed > language regarding high-priority prompts > - refer the question of overall releasability of runit-run to the Release > Team Yes, this seems like an appropriate response from the TC. Bdale
Attachment:
pgphhJfNuP81E.pgp
Description: PGP signature