[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#564536: GRUB maintainer address bounces



On 11.01.2010 23:12, Robert Millan wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:25:40AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
Robert: before we get to far along here, could you tell us about the
configuration of pkg-grub-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org?

It's a subscriber-only mailing list with (system-wide) exception for Debian
role accounts (BTS, PTS, DAK...).

2) Is there moderation in place for those who are not allowed to post?

No.  I don't object to it, but nobody volunteered.  I don't have time to
volunteer myself.

3) Would moderation of non-suscribers (or just a rejection of
    non-negative SA scoring mails) be feasible?

Moderation would be feasible if someone volunteers to do it.

Rejection would be feasible if this is appropiately tuned to garantee a
neglectable amount of false negatives.  Even then, I don't see the advantage
in comparison with a subscriber-only policy.

Note that before this policy was adopted, this list was an horrible, unusable
mess.  I think more than 90% of its content was spam.

In upstream GRUB we've adopted this policy as well, for many years now, and
it's been completely uncontroversial.

kernel people had similar problems, and they moved/replaced many moderated/semi-closed/etc. lists to the main kernel.org mail list server. On every move, the spam and false positive was dropped to
a manageable level (zero or nearly to zero also no bit ML).

So if we are looking for volunteers, I think we should call mainly
for good rule maintainers (it is a difficult job).
Or we should collaborate with kernel postmasters, to share rules and
experiences.
These two "solutions" have a nice side-effect: they will reduce the spams in all debian, BTS and alioth lists.

ciao
	cate


Reply to: