On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 00:25 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> While I'm personally not to enthralled about subscriber-only mailing
> lists, I would have liked to have seen at least a discussion on
> -project and/or -policy about this before immediately elevating to the
> CTTE to have it make a decision.[1]
There was a discussion on -project.
> Robert: before we get to far along here, could you tell us about the
> configuration of pkg-grub-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org?
>
> I'm mainly interested in the answers to the following questions, but
> any additional information or opinion that you have would be nice to
> hear too.
>
> 1) Who is currently allowed to post to pkg-grub-devel?
> 2) Is there moderation in place for those who are not allowed to post?
> 3) Would moderation of non-suscribers (or just a rejection of
> non-negative SA scoring mails) be feasible?
>
> I don't think the CTTE should be making a decision just in the case of
> a single set of packages when this should be something that Debian
> decides archive-wide.
[...]
I agree, but I believe that §3.3 implicitly disallows closed mailing
lists and the committee decision on this would set a precedent.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance.
- Robert Coveyou
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part