Re: Please review proposed resolution: Re: Bug#535645: Wrongfull removal of ia32-libs-tools
- To: debian-ctte@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Please review proposed resolution: Re: Bug#535645: Wrongfull removal of ia32-libs-tools
- From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:53:26 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20090901075326.GF19557@mails.so.argh.org>
- Mail-followup-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, debian-ctte@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <1251647530.12168.4.camel@rover>
- References: <20090823023319.GA13771@jax.donarmstrong.com> <20090823065342.GA14135@dario.dodds.net> <20090823185140.GU13040@volo.donarmstrong.com> <20090824174659.GB28686@dario.dodds.net> <87r5v0l56h.fsf@frosties.localdomain> <1251227318.5849.738.camel@rover> <20090827214814.GT19557@mails.so.argh.org> <20090830070857.GA922@dario.dodds.net> <20090830082310.GZ19557@mails.so.argh.org> <1251647530.12168.4.camel@rover>
* Bdale Garbee (bdale@gag.com) [090830 17:52]:
> On Sun, 2009-08-30 at 10:23 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Steve Langasek (vorlon@debian.org) [090830 09:09]:
> > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:48:14PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > > * Bdale Garbee (bdale@gag.com) [090825 21:09]:
> > > > > So, let's have three choices. Steve's resolution, further discussion,
> > > > > and a re-stated version of Goswin's option along these lines:
> > >
> > > > > agrees that there was insufficient justification to remove the
> > > > > ia32-libs-tools package from the archive. The ftp team is
> > > > > therefore directed to, within one week of the conclusion of this
> > > > > vote, either reinstate the package to the archive, or petition
> > > > > the technical committee to reconsider this issue by
> > > > > communicating further justification for their original decision.
> > >
> > > > How about:
> > > > ... archive, or provide the maintainer and the technical committee
> > > > further justification for their original decision. In that case the
> > > > committee will make another final decision on this topic, considering
> > > > the justifications.
> > >
> > > Is there an agreement about which of these to put on the ballot, or should I
> > > include each of these proposals separately?
> >
> > Bdales and mine shouldn't be both on the ballot - Bdale, which one
> > should be on it?
>
> I don't really care. I like the wording of mine better, since it
> doesn't make stumble over the word 'final'. But I don't expect either
> to garner many votes, so I'm not inclined to spend more time polishing
> the text.
I don't really care either. I too like the wording of mine better -
but well. Steve, please just put on the ballot whatever you think, but
not both.
Cheers,
Andi
>
Reply to: