Re: Please review proposed resolution: Re: Bug#535645: Wrongfull removal of ia32-libs-tools

[Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>]

* Steve Langasek (vorlon@debian.org) [090830 09:09]:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:48:14PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Bdale Garbee (bdale@gag.com) [090825 21:09]:
> > > So, let's have three choices.  Steve's resolution, further discussion,
> > > and a re-stated version of Goswin's option along these lines:
> 
> > >         agrees that there was insufficient justification to remove the
> > >         ia32-libs-tools package from the archive.  The ftp team is
> > >         therefore directed to, within one week of the conclusion of this
> > >         vote, either reinstate the package to the archive, or petition
> > >         the technical committee to reconsider this issue by
> > >         communicating further justification for their original decision.
> 
> > How about:
> > ... archive, or provide the maintainer and the technical committee
> > further justification for their original decision. In that case the
> > committee will make another final decision on this topic, considering
> > the justifications.
> 
> Is there an agreement about which of these to put on the ballot, or should I
> include each of these proposals separately?

Bdales and mine shouldn't be both on the ballot - Bdale, which one
should be on it?



Cheers,
Andi