Re: Bug#539158: Call for Votes on Bug#539158: […] assumes printf is a builtin
- To: debian-ctte@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#539158: Call for Votes on Bug#539158: […] assumes printf is a builtin
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 21:41:38 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87k51k2tct.fsf@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-ctte@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <87ab2mdmh0.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> (Russ Allbery's message of "Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:01:15 -0700")
- References: <20090608140401.30778.89954.reportbug@www.freewrt.org> <Pine.BSM.4.64L.0907291303250.5265@herc.mirbsd.org> <20090729143231.GG5278@dario.dodds.net> <Pine.BSM.4.64L.0907291439520.5265@herc.mirbsd.org> <20090729170338.GA2412@mails.so.argh.org> <20090730101528.GA7601@mails.so.argh.org> <87ab2mdmh0.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
> I'm calling on votes on the following options:
>
> | 1. The Technical Committee refuses to overrule the udev maintainer, as
> | requested by Bug 539158. The committee suggests that the policy
> | maintainers document in the policy what the current best practices on
> | providing printf (and similar functions used in the initrd like [ and
> | test) by shells.
>
> | 2. Further discussion
>
> (As there is already a bug on the policy on the issue of builtins, I'd
> like to leave it to the policy team in case of 1 whether they want to
> clone this bug report or not.)
I vote 1 2.
manoj
--
If it glistens, gobble it! Zippy the Pinhead
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Attachment:
pgphRIgr0kd7M.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Reply to: