On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Andreas Barth wrote: > > I'm calling on votes now for these three options (the last one isn't a > > proposal, but by default in the option set). According to the > > consitution, the voting periode last for up to one week, or until the > > outcome is no longer in doubt. > > > > | 1. Keep /usr/local writeable by group staff (i.e. leave things as they > > | are). > > > > | 2. Decide to change the default so that /usr/local is not writeable by > > | group staff anymore. This change should only be implemented after an > > | appropriate transition plan exists which enables system administrators > > | to maintain the ability of group staff to write to /usr/local. > > | (Reasons for the change are the adaption of other tools like sudo on > > | most sites, and the concept of "least surprise" for novice users.) > > > > | 3. Further discussion. > > Voting: 213 Err, I signed this with my new key, not the key in the keyring. Signed with the old key. Don Armstrong -- Any excuse will serve a tyrant. -- Aesop http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature