foo2zjs

[Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>]

* Debian Bug Tracking System (owner@bugs.debian.org) [081028 10:08]:
> > reassign -2 tech-ctte
> Bug#503814: foo2zjs: getweb script depends on non-free firmware
> Bug reassigned from package `foo2zjs' to `tech-ctte'.

As this bug didn't get a decision from the release team yet, I'd propose
the following decision by the tech ctte:

1. Currently, the submitter claims that the bug is serious, the
maintainer don't think so, and there is no decision by the release team
yet. So the current state of the bug isn't serious, but important. The
maintainers should continue to feel free to adjust the bug severity
according to their decisions (unless of course the release team decides
to overrule them).

2.  As per constitution, we (the tech ctte) only makes decision as last
resort. So currently, the next step would be for anyone who disagrees
with this bug not being release critical to ask the release team to
review the decision and maybe overrule it.

3. If there is a release team decision, and someone is still unhappy
enough then one could ask the tech ctte to overrule the release teams
decision.  However, until the overruling actually happens, the bugs
state remains to stay the way the release team decided.


tech ctte members, any opinion from you on that?



Cheers,
Andi