Re: Bug#438179: RFC3484 rule 9 active again in glibc 2.7-5.

To: debian-ctte@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#438179: RFC3484 rule 9 active again in glibc 2.7-5.
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:41:23 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 87zluwwfjg.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
Mail-followup-to: debian-ctte@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20080114200622.GA21602@roeckx.be> (Kurt Roeckx's message of "Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:06:22 +0100")
References: <[🔎] 20080114200622.GA21602@roeckx.be>

* Kurt Roeckx:

> For those that didn't notice this yet, 2.7-5 reverted the change of
> 2.7-4.  So testing and unstable uses rule 9 again.

I'm confused.  Was this intentional?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bug#438179: RFC3484 rule 9 active again in glibc 2.7-5.
  - From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>

References:
- Bug#438179: RFC3484 rule 9 active again in glibc 2.7-5.
  - From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>

Prev by Date: Results of technical committee vote on mixmaster /etc/default/*
Next by Date: Re: Bug#438179: RFC3484 rule 9 active again in glibc 2.7-5.
Previous by thread: Bug#438179: RFC3484 rule 9 active again in glibc 2.7-5.
Next by thread: Re: Bug#438179: RFC3484 rule 9 active again in glibc 2.7-5.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread