Re: Call for Votes (was Re: glibc's getaddrinfo() sort order)
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 11:20:22AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Given the discussion we've had it's clear we're not willing to consider
> this RC, which means stable will remain with its existing behaviour.
I do think it warrants an update for stable; I only disagree that it's
relevant to overriding the maintainer. I would be fine with recommending
that the SRMs accept an update for etch, but overriding the SRMs decision
making process should surely be contingent on them having a chance to make
that decision?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Reply to: