At 1196610406 time_t, Anthony Towns wrote: > Abraham, Julien, do you have sensible alternative names for your packages > (eg, incorporating the existing libconfig into the libabz package, > or renaming the new libconfig package to libconfig-hyperrealm)? If so, > what are they? Something like libconfighr I guess. libconfig-hyperrealm is a bit too long IMHO. > > I don't have a problem with restricting the scope of the > > decisive part of the TC's formal ruling, provided that we can come up > > with some way to avoid the substitute names being just as poor. > > I'm afraid I'm struggling with incredulity that we even need to deal with > that... NEW processing should deal with it, and the maintainers involved > should be able to figure out that "libconfig1" isn't going to work... For the record, I think you talk about libconfig1 because my ITP of new-libconfig was renamed to libconfig1. This is _not_ my choice, that renaming was done by tbm, see #438683 log. -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature