On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 12:09:46AM +0100, Bdale Garbee wrote: > The udeb structure was invented for debian-installer, and to date > Debian has not supported the use of udebs for any other purpose. (With ftpmaster hat: I would expect non d-i uses of udebs to be in a different section of the archive than main/debian-installer; it would require some development work for that to be possible. I don't believe there's been sufficient justification for non d-i udebs to warrant that effort or the ongoing support of an additional udeb section) > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > [ 2 ] Choice 1: a libstdc++ udeb should be created as per bug #367709 > [ 1 ] Choice 2: a libstdc++ udeb should not be created despite bug #367709 > [ 3 ] Choice 3: Further discussion > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Cheers, aj
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature