[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#367709: Call for vote: gcc: requesting libstdc++.udeb

On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 12:09:46AM +0100, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> The udeb structure was invented for debian-installer, and to date 
> Debian has not supported the use of udebs for any other purpose.

(With ftpmaster hat: I would expect non d-i uses of udebs to be in a
different section of the archive than main/debian-installer; it would
require some development work for that to be possible. I don't believe
there's been sufficient justification for non d-i udebs to warrant that
effort or the ongoing support of an additional udeb section)

> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> [ 2 ] Choice 1: a libstdc++ udeb should be created as per bug #367709
> [ 1 ] Choice 2: a libstdc++ udeb should not be created despite bug #367709
> [ 3 ] Choice 3: Further discussion
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: