Bug#350739: #350739: cdrecord status?

To: Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Cc: don@debian.org, 377109@bugs.debian.org, 350739@bugs.debian.org, erast@gnusolaris.org
Subject: Bug#350739: #350739: cdrecord status?
From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 20:29:18 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060708182918.GH2818@mails.so.argh.org>
Reply-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, 350739@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <44AF88AA.nailFVC21LP1H@burner>
References: <44AD7FF0.nail8EK11M37L@burner> <1152224952.5505.68.camel@xerces> <44AE4D17.nail8OT11A91C@burner> <[🔎] 20060707125710.GA21216@mails.so.argh.org> <44AE67EC.nail8QI28SU0R@burner> <20060708040142.GO7013@volo.donarmstrong.com> <44AF88AA.nailFVC21LP1H@burner>

* Joerg Schilling (schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de) [060708 12:28]:
> The GPL enforces other contidions under which the resultant binary may be
> distributed but it does not enforce _anything_ on the non-GPL source.

Well, but it might result in the binary being unredistributable at all.
This is the case here. As Debian provides binaries for anything in main,
and this is not possible with your combination, your package cannot go
to main.


Andi
-- 
  http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#350739: #350739: cdrecord status?
  - From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>

Prev by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#367709: requesting libstdc++ .udeb in order to produce c++ based images based on d-i technology (but not d-i).
Next by Date: Bug#350739: #350739: cdrecord status?
Previous by thread: Bug#350739: #350739: cdrecord status?
Next by thread: Bug#350739: #350739: cdrecord status?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread