On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 02:12:56PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Steve Langasek writes ("vote time again: stepping down as chair"): > > Regrettably, there hasn't been any discussion since the end of the last vote > > about how to manage these rotations properly without adding undue overhead, > > so I guess that may be something we need to discuss again this round. For > > my part, I definitely think that a 1-month rotation would be too short, > > regardless of whether any voting was required, just because anything that > > happens in the TC takes long enough that we would be doing a whole lot of > > shuffling of current business between chairs. > Right. Personally, I don't think this rotation is workable, as I've > said before. So my current plan is to vote as if I was voting for a > permanent chair. Sure, that's understandable. In that case, perhaps we should be asking who among us is interested in serving as a permanent chair? I don't mind wearing hats, but this one seems to clash with this tie I'm wearing (hmm, or is this a noose...) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature