On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 23:29:14 +1000 Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 02:35:59PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > > On 3/7/06, Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 07:20:31PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > > Please see http://wiki.debian.org/LinuxKernelIdeProblem that I > > > > created today and have invited the kernel team and udev > > > > developers to improve on. > > > An assembly of patent ... > > It looks to me like that's a wiki page. > > In other words, you can fix problems on it directly without needing > > to ask for help or permission. > > Which Sven's since done, leading the page to begin with: [snip ranting] > Jonas's last revision, without Sven's comments, is available at: > > http://wiki.debian.org/LinuxKernelIdeProblem?action=recall&rev=4 > > From what I can see of that, the maintainer seems on track to solve > the problem. I don't see any great reason to overrule that process. However fond I am of wiki, I tend to agree with Ian that wiki is unsuitable for too diverging opinions. I was trying to track the chain reaction of problems/workarounds involved, while it seems Sven use same page to proove non-existance of current kernel only. I'll continue working on the wiki, but let's debate through email as Ian recommended, and use wiki only by referring to explicit revisions to avoid confusion. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
Attachment:
pgpcw5A7zm540.pgp
Description: PGP signature