Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main
On 4/5/06, Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> wrote:
> And for what benefit? Just like the FSF started by
> distributing and build software on non-free systems, putting out
> software that may initially be more heavily used with non-free
> input/output is still desirable, since it is a beachhead that can
> then be exploited for free purposes by someone out there, who may
> never be exposed to the software in question was its distribution to
> be severely limited.
Has someone suggested that we should not build or distribute
ndiswrapper?
We've suggested that we not consider it an integral part of our
free operating system, but that doesn't seem to be what you're
talking about.
[P.S. despite the fact that my vote on the GFDL issue put
me in an extreme minority, I do not have a problem with the
outcome of that vote. But that's better discussed on other
lists.]
--
Raul
Reply to: