[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main



On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 11:36:49PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I would like to draft a version of Anthony's answer that makes it a
> recommendation rather than a mandatory decision.  In fact, we probably
> need four versions:

>  * We think it's our decision and we decide (insisting iff 3:1)
>    that it should go into main
>  * We think it's our decision and we decide (insisting iff 3:1)
>    that it should go into contrib
>  * We think it's not our decision formally but we conclude
>    that it should go into main
>  * We think it's not our decision formally but we conclude
>    that it should go into contrib

> It will be easier to draft those four alternatives than to have
> everyone write round and say which ones they prefer.

FWIW, I'm not a fan of synthetic ballot options.  Wouldn't it make better
use of people's time in the drafting to limit ourselves to those options
that at least one of the drafters is actually planning to vote above FD?

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: