Re: Technical committee chair rotation, draft resolution
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 03:07:22PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Steve Langasek writes ("Re: Technical committee chair rotation, draft resolution"):
> > Voting no, for the record. In addition to the points raised regarding the
> > length of term, this resolution purports to be a "decision in advance" about
> > who will be elected chair at various future points, which I don't believe is
> > constitutionally valid.
> If you believe that, then the whole thing is going to be far too much
> hassle. We can't be having a faffy voting election thing every month
> or two just to routinely elect the chairman.
We can't manage one mail each every two months?
Cheers,
aj
Reply to: