On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 11:58:40PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: >On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 04:37:49PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: >>>Please see #266762 for any discussion on this. >>Can you explain why a Policy violation (i.e. not providing shared >>libs for a -dev package) is of "Severity: wishlist" > >Again, see #266762. > >>esp. in the context of repeated FTBFS caused by it? > >To be honest, it is not pvm's problem that rpvm does not work with >pure upstream pvm on non-i386. > >Feel free to invoke the ctte if you feel this is wrong; note that >this _will_ be fixed for etch, but not for sarge. Invoking the ctte, as per sgunderson's suggestion. In another message edd didn't oppose to bring this matter to the ctte. I think, the three parties involved agree to request the ctte's opinion to this problem. A serious bug, #266837, has been downgraded to whislist. Could the ctte decide whether or not this is right? Kind regards, Anibal Monsalve Salazar -- .''`. Debian GNU/Linux | Building 28C : :' : Free Operating System | Monash University VIC 3800 Australia `. `' http://debian.org/ | http://www-personal.monash.edu/~anibal `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature