[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [ssta@clothcat.org: Re: c/r for nonsubscribers Re: Posting on the list [pasc@murphy.debian.org: Re: md5sum <FILE produces spurious ` -' in output]]

Previously Ian Jackson wrote:
> I'm strongly opposed to SPF, mainly because the technical details
> are insane.  See for example what I said in RISKS:
>  http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/23.18.html#subj10

Amusingly I encountered a SPF filter for the first time this week: a
mailserver rejected an email from declaring it was spoofed. Only it
didn't see that the mailserver that contact it was only relaying the
message and was not the one I used. Only way to work around that for me:
remove SPF records from DNS again.


Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>    It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/                   It is hard to make things simple.

Reply to: