Re: [ssta@clothcat.org: Re: c/r for nonsubscribers Re: Posting on the list [pasc@murphy.debian.org: Re: md5sum <FILE produces spurious ` -' in output]]

To: Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>
Cc: Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>, listmaster@lists.debian.org, debian-ctte@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [ssta@clothcat.org: Re: c/r for nonsubscribers Re: Posting on the list [pasc@murphy.debian.org: Re: md5sum <FILE produces spurious ` -' in output]]
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:20:44 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040702102044.GP16959@wiggy.net>
Mail-followup-to: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>, Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>, Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>, listmaster@lists.debian.org, debian-ctte@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <16611.6983.400625.480599@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk>
References: <20040601234905.GI27373@zanclid.redellipse.net> <20040624113720.U5678@links.magenta.com> <1088454968.1703.83.camel@plaza.davidnicol.com> <20040628164659.X5678@links.magenta.com> <20040629111927.GM13365@wiggy.net> <16611.6983.400625.480599@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk>

Previously Ian Jackson wrote:
> I'm strongly opposed to SPF, mainly because the technical details
> are insane.  See for example what I said in RISKS:
>  http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/23.18.html#subj10

Amusingly I encountered a SPF filter for the first time this week: a
mailserver rejected an email from declaring it was spoofed. Only it
didn't see that the mailserver that contact it was only relaying the
message and was not the one I used. Only way to work around that for me:
remove SPF records from DNS again.

Wichert.

-- 
Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>    It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/                   It is hard to make things simple.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ssta@clothcat.org: Re: c/r for nonsubscribers Re: Posting on the list [pasc@murphy.debian.org: Re: md5sum <FILE produces spurious ` -' in output]]
  - From: Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>