[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge

On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 21:07:37 -0600, Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com> said: 

> moth@debian.org (Raul Miller) writes:
>> [1] We need to make sure we know who is active.  Maybe we should
>> have a "show of hands" on who on the committee is actively reading
>> this thread?

> I'm here, reading, and thinking.  Nothing productive to inject into
> the discussion yet.

>> Maybe there's some improvements that coud be made on that
>> suggestion?

> Based on what I've heard today, I think we should expect at least
> one, and perhaps several, GRs to be proposed in the next few days.

	Well, we have a properly seconded proposal, and an amendment
 which has almost got enough seconds. Can we let the wording of the gr
 be, and just recommend that the GR under discussion is our
 recommended solution, and let the developers decide on the wording as
 they go along?

The real reason psychology is hard is that psychologists are trying to
do the impossible.
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: