Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 21:05:17 -0400, Raul Miller <moth@debian.org> said:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 04:53:36AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=sarge-ignore
That is not exhaustive; make and Gnus are not on that list
(because I closed the gfdl bugs, that was before I educated myself on
the gfdl).
> [2] I think the right course for the committee to take in this case
> is offering advice. On the one side, I can offer my earlier
> suggestion (posted to debian-vote):
[SNIP]
> Maybe there's some improvements that coud be made on that
> suggestion?
I understand that such a proposal is making its way through a
select group of people, and shall emerge on -vote shortly (no, I am
not involved).
> I've been looking for other alternatives, and if there are any good
> ones I'm not seeing them.
Me neither. I suggest we go along with the above, perhaps
stopping short of specifying the exact language of the GR being
advocated.
manoj
--
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go
away". Philip K. Dick
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: