Re: Technical Committee: decision on #119517?
>>"Ian" == Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk> writes:
Ian> Err, the behaviour you see is AIUI the same you get from *any* failure
Ian> by fvwm to open or parse the config file; ie, it's fvwm's failsafe
Ian> response (which is reasonably good, but could do with better error
Ian> reporting in most configurations).
Yes, it is. I did not see lionk failure, and, even in an
airport in Zimbabwe, I can then edit my config file and make fvwm
work. A misconfigured application is understood to be user error, a
linker failure is hard to characterize in that fashion, and even
harder to fix without access to the archive.
manoj
--
The two things that can get you into trouble quicker than anything
else are fast women and slow horses.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: