[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#154950: Gnome 2 transition

Previously Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Work out Gnome 2 in a separate staging area (without any "2" suffix), and
> move it to unstable one day (you have to define what is the criterion
> for defining that "one day" because people won't agree otherwise).

With testing you could use unstable as your staging area in which case
this would degenerate into solution one. Considering unstable is just
that (ie unstable) and I suspect GNOME2 problems will be resolved by
the time sarge freezes that sounds like a good approach to me.

Related question though: do you expect GNOME1 to still see active
use and maintenance in the future, or do you expect GNOME 1 to be


 /wichert@wiggy.net         This space intentionally left occupied \
| wichert@deephackmode.org                    http://www.wiggy.net/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Reply to: