Previously Ian Jackson wrote: > See below for the full text, and my last message for my views. > (Wichert said he wanted until at least the 5th and hasn't said > anything more, so ...) So I'm here. > I hereby call for a vote on this resolution. We'll vote on the whole > lot on one ballot - effectively, conducting two votes one after the > other. The overall options are: > > A Version A (allow maintainer discretion to bundle) > B Version B (overrule maintainer, split packages) > FD Further Discussion I don't think there is a perfect answer to this problem. My vote therefore is as follows: 1 A Version A (allow maintainer discretion to bundle) 2 FD Further Discussion 3 B Version B (overrule maintainer, split packages) Wichert. -- _________________________________________________________________ /wichert@wiggy.net This space intentionally left occupied \ | wichert@deephackmode.org http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Attachment:
pgpKPPjWlFIZ1.pgp
Description: PGP signature