[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Technical Committee: decision on #119517?

>>"Ian" == Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk> writes:

 Ian> Err, the behaviour you see is AIUI the same you get from *any* failure
 Ian> by fvwm to open or parse the config file; ie, it's fvwm's failsafe
 Ian> response (which is reasonably good, but could do with better error
 Ian> reporting in most configurations).

	Yes, it is. I did not see lionk failure, and, even in an
 airport in Zimbabwe, I can then edit my config file and make fvwm
 work. A misconfigured application is understood to be user error, a
 linker failure is hard to characterize in that fashion, and even
 harder to fix without access to the archive.

 The two things that can get you into trouble quicker than anything
 else are fast women and slow horses.
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: