Re: debian-ctte mailing list: unmoderate, please
- To: Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>
- Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@debian.org>, listmaster@lists.debian.org, debian-ctte@lists.debian.org, Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>, Debian Admin <debian-admin@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: debian-ctte mailing list: unmoderate, please
- From: Jaakko Niemi <listmaster@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 15:23:18 -0600
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20020212152318.L4291@murphy.debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <15462.30343.188062.733802@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk>; from ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk on Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 01:32:55PM +0000
- References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1020209170422.10934A-100000@wakko.debian.net> <1011444049.a91ab44d@debian.org> <20020119142717.GC627@wiggy.net> <87adv9opo1.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com> <15435.10850.669557.311993@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk> <1011931477.a99bae9d@debian.org> <20020125112705.GU11905@wiggy.net> <1012246724.3bcfb6d6@debian.org> <15446.65093.382369.958579@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk> <15462.30343.188062.733802@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk>
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Jason Gunthorpe writes ("Re: ctte list hosed?"):
> > This is probably a side effect of the moderation stuff, I saw your email
> > on the -ctte list.
>
> We've decided the moderation stuff isn't working well for us and want
> rid of it.
>
> > Has a request been made to listmaster to de-moderate the list yet?
>
> Yes, on the 29th of January I wrote:
> > To: listmaster@lists.debian.org
> > Cc: debian-ctte@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: debian-ctte mailing list: unmoderate, please
> > Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 19:55:49 +0000
> >
> > Could you please make debian-ctte@lists.debian.org unmoderated ?
> > The moderation seems to be doing much more harm than good.
> > (We're all pretty much agreed that this change should be Also.)
>
> I haven't had any reply.
Moderation taken off, but posting is still limited to subscribers
only. If we need to remove that too, let me know.
--
"And if the messenger would shoot first?"
Reply to: