Re: Installed-Build-Depends lack architecture qualification
Helmut Grohne wrote:
> In order to get some confidence in this patch, I've performed some tests
> and compared .buildinfo files using dpkg with/without this patch. I
> chose hostname as a very simple example and libxml2 as an example that
> involves dependencies on virtual packages, dependencies on Multi-Arch:
> foreign packages, :any-annotated dependencies on Multi-Arch: allowed
> packages as well as normal dependencies on Multi-Arch: same packages.
For my part, I've tested a few native builds with Helmut's patch
applied and do not detect any changes in the generated .buildinfo file
(except, of course, for the Build-Date field).
Hope this helps. Thanks, Helmut.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` email@example.com 🍥 chris-lamb.co.uk