On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 23:25:34 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > Conceptually, we need the full perl:native for the build toolchain > (mostly ExtUtils::MakeMaker and its dependencies, some of which like > Cwd are architecture specific.) So I think we should use > Build-Depends: perl:native, perl-xs-dev Good, that was my hunch too. > > I'm very much in favour of finding a simple scheme and not several > > options, like: > > * arch:all -> B-D: perl > > * arch:any -> B-D: perl:native, perl-xs-dev > > > > I hope something like that is possible. > I'm afraid the above choice between two options is pretty much exactly > what I was aiming for. No no, I expressed my self a bit unclear (and only added invisble parentheses to my sentence). What I tried to say is that I hope that we get exactly this very simple very clean solution with exactly 2 variants (one for arch:any and one for arch:all), and not a different solution with a myriad of options and conditions. So if the above is your aim I'm very happy :) > In other news, I'm attaching a prototype implementation for > Debian::Debhelper::Buildsystem::perl_makemaker that seems to work great; Excellent. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature