Hi riscv64 porters, ping. On 11/7/25 23:53, Christoph Berg wrote:
Rather than this being RC for all architectures, I would say the proper "fix" would be to remove sbcl on riscv64 since that architecture is new.My argument is that the actual problem is that sbcl is now available on riscv64. If that architecture had not appeared, buildapp and pgloader (and sbcl) would not be buggy.
I don't like these arguments, although I understand them very much. I was hoping that you'd see the commitment of being a porter to at least have a look and report back, even if you can't fix it. sbcl is a compiler, so at the root of a chain of things. In my humble opinion, compilers that are part of testing on riscv64 should be higher up on your list of packages to take care of.
Paul
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature