[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#982174: marked as done (slime: please fix use of define-obsolete-variable-alias in hyperspec.el)

Your message dated Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:33:45 +0000
with message-id <E1lAUpd-000C6h-8a@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#982174: fixed in slime 2:2.26.1+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #982174,
regarding slime: please fix use of define-obsolete-variable-alias in hyperspec.el
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
982174: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=982174
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: slime
Version: 2:2.26.1+dfsg-1

Dear maintainer,

The version of slime in sid will not bytecompile against Emacs 28
because lib/hyperspec.el calls define-obsolete-variable-alias with the
wrong number of arguments.  See <https://github.com/slime/slime/issues/594>.

Emacs 28 is not released nor in Debian yet, but some of us are using it
already, so would you consider cherry-picking upstream commit 48bfe6cc
in an upload to Debian, please?

Thanks.

-- 
Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: slime
Source-Version: 2:2.26.1+dfsg-2
Done: Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
slime, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 982174@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> (supplier of updated slime package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:14:00 +0100
Source: slime
Architecture: source
Version: 2:2.26.1+dfsg-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team <debian-common-lisp@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org>
Closes: 982174
Changes:
 slime (2:2.26.1+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * emacs28.patch: new patch, fixes compatibility issue with Emacs 28
     (Closes: #982174)
   * d/upstream/metadata: add Documentation field
   * Mark autokgtest on ecl and clisp as superficial.
     On those implementations, we only try to load swank.
Checksums-Sha1:
 b6573ae6f9c128c2d3c597cc50569f9a2c29c982 2244 slime_2.26.1+dfsg-2.dsc
 05970ac5ccc6ab404f0df68c755c43888cd820f9 19084 slime_2.26.1+dfsg-2.debian.tar.xz
 d045243aa0cbc3dd5a0b9d9a0b8d56784f13f9d3 10918 slime_2.26.1+dfsg-2_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 b5eae5f73ea0560deb16172ebd21f9b9a0620600858bf262cdc4d1aa622f9cb5 2244 slime_2.26.1+dfsg-2.dsc
 aa614cfd8bbe27212975b382abce6e8c889b2fc8344587261d175cb7d6bbeb60 19084 slime_2.26.1+dfsg-2.debian.tar.xz
 bd61bd2e1a607be69678ccd0cb328d896fb7aeec69bd5858684583f561a60fe2 10918 slime_2.26.1+dfsg-2_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 d94c521be984f3c483f822bc6c838dcf 2244 lisp optional slime_2.26.1+dfsg-2.dsc
 68e1c2d6a6144b3f0ded59c9a4dfabd9 19084 lisp optional slime_2.26.1+dfsg-2.debian.tar.xz
 c4f6f5233503abfbd3583f6a1eacd7d6 10918 lisp optional slime_2.26.1+dfsg-2_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=3VbF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: