GNU clisp 2.49.90 available for beta-testing
Dear Bruno,
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 08:41:51AM +0100, S?bastien Villemot wrote:
> > > - ppc64el: lisp image generated, but fails to compile asdf (segfault)
> >
> > These MAY be fixed in 2.49.92, due to the memory-map fixes.
>
> Unfortunately this is not the case.
>
> > If not, please try adding -DSAFETY=3 to the CFLAGS for these architectures.
>
> I tried a manual build on a ppc64el box with -DSAFETY=3 and indeed it fixes the
> problem. Should I add the flag to the Debian packaging or do you plan to
> investigate this further?
Actually I was able to fix the issue (and then another similar one in the
testsuite) by lowering GCC optimisation for two files (hashtabl and package).
I attach a mercurial changeset (on the clisp-2.50 branch) that implements this
workaround, please consider applying it.
Best,
--
??????? S?bastien Villemot
??????? Debian Developer
??????? http://sebastien.villemot.name
??????? http://www.debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ppc64el.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 1382 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-common-lisp-devel/attachments/20180226/2e784f9c/attachment.patch>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-common-lisp-devel/attachments/20180226/2e784f9c/attachment.sig>
Reply to: